Art and Design
Art and Design
ISSN 2617-0272 e-ISSN 2617-0280
DOI: 10.30857/2617-0272
Submit an article

Article

Download article

Images of inspiration: Monuments to the poet Adam Mickiewicz within the range of European sacred art

Andrii Tarasenko

Received 15.12.2025, Revised 02.03.2026, Accepted 09.04.2026 Published 10.04.2026

Abstract

The relevance of the study lies in the need for an interdisciplinary and comparative interpretation of monuments to Adam Mickiewicz and Taras Shevchenko as a component of the European monumental discourse of the nineteenth-twentieth centuries. The aim was to analyse the transformation of ancient and Christian iconography in the depiction of the poet’s creative inspiration through the monuments to Adam Mickiewicz in Lviv (1904, A. Pöppel), Paris (1909-1929, A. Bourdelle) and Odesa (2004, O. Kniazyk). Iconographic, iconological, cultural-historical, semiotic, comparative and artistic-stylistic methods were applied. The connection of the image of the poet with the sacred iconography of apostles, saints, and geniuses in the art of the Renaissance, Baroque, Classicism, and Romanticism was examined. The influence of ancient and Christian traditions on the architectonics of the monuments was established, in particular the symbolism of the column as the Axis of the World and of the altar as the idea of sacrifice. In the Lviv monument Adam Mickiewicz was depicted as a mediator between the earthly and the heavenly; in Paris – as a prophet, drawing on the iconography of the Apotheosis of Rome and the allegory of freedom; in Odesa – as an image of inner inspiration referring to Greek kouroi. The compositions combined sacred and secular motifs, creating a synthetic image of the poet. A typological kinship was revealed with the monuments to Taras Shevchenko in Kharkiv (1935) and Lviv (1992-1996), which underlined the universality of the image of the poet as a spiritual leader. The results revealed the sculptors’ innovative approach to the synthesis of sacred and secular images, reflecting a link with European traditions. The study is useful for art historians, cultural studies scholars and researchers of the interrelationship between literature, sculpture and urban space


Keywords:

Taras Shevchenko; monumental sculpture; ancient and Christian iconography; symbolism; creative method; intertext

https://doi.org/10.30857/2617-0272.2026.1.2

Retrieved from Vol. 9, No. 1, 2026

Pages 20-33

References Suggested citation

References

  1. Artsy. (n.d.). Statue of Aulus Metellus. Retrieved from https://museoomero.it/en/opere/statue-of-aulus-metellus/.
  2. Bellentani, F. (2023). A monument’s many faces: The meanings of the face in monuments and memorials. Semiotica, 255, 95-116. doi: 10.1515/sem-2023-0165.
  3. Biryulov, Y. (2015). Lviv sculpture of the 19th-20th centuries: From classicism to avant-garde. Lviv: Apriori.
  4. Cáceres Santacruz, N.A., & Páez Coello, X.E. (2024). The power of words. The monument to Juan Montalvo in Ambato. Humanidades, 15, 187-210. doi: 10.25185/15.8.
  5. Column of Antoninus Pius. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://colosseumrometickets.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Column-of-Antoninus-Pius-Front-view.jpg.
  6. Cotta Ramusino, E. (2024). William Butler Yeats and monumentalisation. Studi Irlandesi. A Journal of Irish Studies, 14, 95-105. doi: 10.36253/SIJIS-2239-3978-15384.
  7. Damjanović, D., & Łupienko, A. (Eds.). (2022). Forging architectural tradition: National narratives, monument preservation and architectural work in the nineteenth century. London: Routledge. doi: 10.3167/9781800733374.
  8. Davies, D. (2023). Sculpture. In N. Carroll & J. Gilmore (Eds.), The Routledge companion to the philosophies of painting and sculpture (pp. 17-27). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003312727.
  9. Discover Ukraine. (n.d.). Monument to Taras Shevchenko on Freedom Avenue. Retrieved from https://discover.ua/locations/pamyatnik-tarasu-shevchenko-na-prospekte-svobody.
  10. Diupero, M.-T. (1995). The Mickiewicz monument by Bourdelle and its dual commentary by the artist. Histoire de l’art, 29-30, 89-101. doi: 10.3406/hista.1995.2659.
  11. Dlugozima, A., & Rybak-Niedziółka, K. (2022). The assessment of the attractiveness of memorials in historic urban landscape. Journal of Urban Design, 27(4), 459-482. doi: 10.1080/13574809.2021.2011182.
  12. Eberbach Monastery. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://kloster-eberbach.de/de.
  13. Encyclopedia Britannica. (n.d.). Trajan’s Column. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Trajans-Column.
  14. Farah, K. (2024). Set in stone: Modern monuments and strategic heritage in Xaltocan, Mexico. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 30(9), 1010-1025. doi: 10.1080/13527258.2024.2363815.
  15. Gill, J. (2023). Modern American poetry and the architectural imagination: The harmony of forms. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/res/hgad095.
  16. Heilig Geist Munich. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://heilig-geist-muenchen.de/.
  17. Jung, C.G. (1968). The archetypes and the collective unconscious. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  18. Koropeckyj, R. (2010). Adam Mickiewicz as a Polish national icon. In M. Cornis-Pope & J. Neubauer (Eds.), History of the literary cultures of East-Central Europe (pp. 19-39). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. doi: 10.1075/chlel.xxv.04kor.
  19. Library of the P. Vasilenko Kharkiv National Technical University of Agriculture. (n.d.). Taras Shevchenko monument. Retrieved from https://library.khntusg.com.ua/pamyatnik-shevchenko.
  20. Masyk, R. (2008). Pl. Mitskevycha – monument to Adam Mickiewicz. Interactive Lviv. Retrieved from https://lia.lvivcenter.org/uk/objects/monument-mitskevych/.
  21. Panofsky, E. (1955). Meaning in the visual arts. Garden City: Doubleday.
  22. Panofsky, E. (1960). Renaissance and renascences in Western art. New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780429497698.
  23. Piero della Francesca. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://casavacanze.poderesantapia.com/arte/pierodellafrancesca/storiedellaveracroce/storiedellaveracroce4annunciazione2.htm.
  24. Plato. (1925).         Plato with an English translation. London: William Heinemann.
  25. Purici, S., & Mareci Sabol, H. (2021). Built to last: Defining identity by the statues of Chernivtsi. Journal of Social Sciences and Political Studies, 7(4). doi: 10.24193/JSSPSI.2021.7.04.
  26. Quin, J. (2022). W. B. Yeats and the language of sculpture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780192843159.001.0001.
  27. Robinson, T.F., & Savarese, J. (2022). Introduction: Romanticism and vision. European Romantic Review, 33(4), 451-460. doi: 10.1080/10509585.2022.2090684.
  28. Rodger, J. (2022). The architectural monument to Robert Burns in the New Age of identity politics and Nationalism. In The Oxford handbook of Robert Burns (pp. 262-283). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198846246.001.0001.
  29. Royal Society of Sculptors. (n.d.). Alfred Drury (1856-1944). Retrieved from https://sculptors.org.uk/past-members/alfred-drury.
  30. Ruczaj, M. (2014). “Daringly, yet with reverence”: Pearse, Mickiewicz and the theology of national messianism. Études d'histoire et de civilisation, 39(1), 57-71. doi: 10.4000/etudesirlandaises.3744.
  31. Rudenko, V. (2020). Exhibition of an extremely valuable collection of graphic works by an outstanding Ukrainian artist. Zn.ua. Retrieved from http://zn.ua/ukr/UKRAINE/vistavka-nadzvichayno-cinnoyi-kolekciyi-grafiki-vidatnogo-ukrayinskogo-hudozhnika-337448_.html.
  32. Rusu, M.S. (2023). “Eminescu is everywhere”: Charting the memorial spatialization of a national icon. Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 24(4), 735-753. doi: 10.1080/14683857.2023.2243697.
  33. Rusu, M.S. (2024). Emplacing Eminescu: The memorial spatialization of Romania’s national poet in urban street nomenclature. Journal of Romanian Studies, 6(1), 95-121. doi: 10.3828/JRNS.2024.6.
  34. Saint Louis Art Museum. (n.d.). St. John the Baptist. Retrieved from https://www.slam.org/collection/objects/36639/.
  35. Schemper-Sparholz, I. (2021). State of research and research questions – historical and current positions on sculpture at the end of the Habsburg Monarchy. RIHA Journal, 261. doi: 10.11588/riha.2021.1.81887.
  36. Schemper-Sparholz, I., & Mang, C. (2021). Vienna as a sculptural centre in the long nineteenth century: Current research on sculpture in Central Europe. RIHA Journal, 260. doi: 10.11588/riha.2021.1.81885.
  37. Sketchline. (n.d.). Monument to Adam Mickiewicz. Retrieved from https://thesketchline.com/en/sculptures/monument-to-adam-mickiewicz/.
  38. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. (n.d.). Saint John Devouring the book, from “The Apocalypse”. Retrieved from https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/397138.
  39. Tresidder, J. (1997). The Hutchinson dictionary of symbols. Oxford: Helicon.
  40. University of Cambridge. (n.d.). Munich Kouros. Retrieved from https://museum.classics.cam.ac.uk/collections/casts/munich-kouros.
  41. V&A South Kensington. (2002). St John the Baptist. Retrieved from https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O70439/st-john-the-baptist-statue-rodin-auguste/.
  42. Vienna. (n.d.). 6th district – Haydn Monument. Retrieved from https://www.austriasites.com/vienna/bezirk06_haydndenkmal.htm.
  43. Wu, Y.-f. (2022). “A sick eagle” and “I am”: Hymns to sculpture by Keats and Rilke. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 24(2), article number 10. doi: 10.7771/1481-4374.3886.
  44. Yakymova, O. (2023). Artistic and stylistic features of the human image in monumental art of Eastern Galicia in the first third of the 20th century. Bulletin of the Lviv National Academy of Arts, 50, 74-81. doi: 10.37131/2524-0943-2023-50-7.

Suggested citation

Tarasenko, А. (2026). Images of inspiration: Monuments to the poet Adam Mickiewicz within the range of European sacred art. Art and Design, 9(1), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.30857/2617-0272.2026.1.2