Art and Design
Art and Design
ISSN 2617-0272 e-ISSN 2617-0280
DOI: 10.30857/2617-0272
Submit an article

Article

Download article

Rhizomatic structures and marginal aesthetics in art clusters

Sofiia Shkoliar

Received 27.01.2026, Revised 01.01.1970, Accepted 25.06.2026 Published 26.06.2026

Abstract

This article examined marginalised art clusters as specific urban formations that emerge within semi abandoned or transformed industrial spaces outside institutional planning frameworks. This study aimed to conceptualise such art clusters as rhizomatic structures in the sense of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, and to interpret their aesthetic significance through the spatial and sensory experience articulated by Gaston Bachelard. The methodological framework was based on an interdisciplinary approach that combines urban analysis, philosophy of space, cultural studies, and the study of artistic practices, with particular attention to street art and temporary interventions. The analysis used the concepts of rhizome, deterritorialisation, and the poetics of space, which make it possible to interpret art clusters as non-linear network formations and to assess their aesthetic potential. The findings indicated that marginalised art clusters are not the result of deliberate design but emerge as dynamic, rhizomatic structures shaped by multiple creative practices, spontaneous interactions, and artistic interventions within semi-abandoned spaces. Street art, performative actions, and temporary installations function as semiotic markers that transform neglected environments into aesthetically significant spaces with poetic and sensory dimensions. The scientific novelty of the study lied in integrating the concept of the rhizome with the analysis of marginal art clusters as aesthetic formations in post-industrial spaces. This approach allowed them to be understood not only as social or cultural phenomena but also as forms of experience and becoming within the urban environment. The practical significance of the research lies in its potential application to the reconsideration of approaches to the revitalisation of neglected territories and the development of non institutional artistic practices 


Keywords:

art clusters; rhizome; street art; ruin aesthetics; urban studies; industrial design; deterritorialisation

https://doi.org/10.30857/2617-0272.2026.2.8

Retrieved from Vol. 9, No. 2, 2026

Pages 95-105

References Suggested citation

References

  1. Angelidou, M., Politis, C., & Fellnhofer, K. (2025). Participatory and responsible policy-design for urban planning, transport and energy driven by innovation: A guidebook. Discover Cities, 2, article number 42. doi: 10.1007/s44327-025-00076-0.
  2. Bachelard, G. (1994). The poetics of space: The classic look at how we experience intimate places. Boston: Beacon Press.
  3. Campos, R. (2021). Urban art in Lisbon: Opportunities, tensions and paradoxes. Cultural Trends, 30(2), 139-155. doi: 10.1080/09548963.2021.1897779.
  4. Cervesato, A., Antiga, T., & Proca, E. (2024). Architectural experimentations: New meanings for ancient ruins. Architecture, 4(3), 639-650. doi: 10.3390/architecture4030033.
  5. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
  6. DeSilvey, C., & Edensor, T. (2013). Reckoning with ruins. Progress in Human Geography, 37(4), 465-485. doi: 10.1177/0309132512462271.
  7. Dionisio, M.R., & Carr, J. (2022). Prismatic immersion of urban ruins: A framework for the integration of ruins’ multiple geographies in urban regeneration. Cities, 130, article number 103818. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103818.
  8. Edensor, T. (2005). Industrial ruins: Space, aesthetics and materiality. New York: Berg Publishers.
  9. Gardner, J. (2024). What makes a wasteland? A contemporary archaeology of urban waste sites. Historical Archaeology, 58, 482-510. doi: 10.1007/s41636-024-00510-x.
  10. RomanyWG. (2011). Out of sight: Urban art / abandoned spaces. London: Carpet Bombing Culture.
  11. Happy Sleepy. (n.d.). Introduction: Rhizome. Retrieved from https://happysleepy.com.
  12. Hell, J., & Schönle, A. (Eds.). (2009). Ruins of modernity. Durham: Duke University Press.
  13. Henshaw, V. (2014). Urban smellscapes: Understanding and designing city smell environments. London: Routledge.
  14. Hughes, D.T. (2016). Stories on design: Empty and abandoned buildings. Retrieved from https://www.yellowtrace.com.au.
  15. Novy, J., & Colomb, C. (2016). Protest and resistance in the tourist city. London: Routledge.
  16. O’Callaghan, C., & Di Feliciantonio, C. (Eds.). (2021). The new urban ruins. Bristol: Policy Press.
  17. Patman, B. (2019). Beauty in ruins: The wonder of abandoned buildings – a photo essay. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com.
  18. Pinder, D. (2005). Arts of urban exploration. Cultural Geographies, 12(4), 383-411. doi: 10.1191/1474474005eu347oa.
  19. Rahman, M.R., & Habib, A. (2025). Urban voids as opportunities: A review of global strategies for public space regeneration. In Proceedings of international conference on civil engineering research & innovations (pp. 2386-2391). Rajshahi: Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology.
  20. Scarbrough, E. (2023). Urban ruins and the neo-picturesque landscape. Aesthetic Investigations, 6(1), 5-18. doi: 10.58519/aesthinv.v6i1.12089.
  21. Shkoliar, S. (2025). Art clusters as urban heterotopias: Architectural transformation and socio-cultural impact. Demiurge: Ideas, Technologies, Perspectives of Design, 8(1), 87-107. doi: 10.31866/2617-7951.8.1.2025.330504.
  22. Wang, D. (2022). The poetic expression of “urban ruins” in paintings. In Proceedings of SEAA 2022 (pp. 1069-1075). Chengdu: International Conference on Science Education and Art Appreciation.
  23. Young, A. (2013). Street art, public city: Law, crime and the urban imagination (1st ed.). London: Routledge.

Suggested citation

Shkoliar, S. (2026). Rhizomatic structures and marginal aesthetics in art clusters. Art and Design, 9(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.30857/2617-0272.2026.2.8