Українська
Berdynskykh, S., & Iakovlev, M.
(2024).
Properties that reveal the expression of project graphics.
Art and Design,
7(1),
78-90.
https://doi.org/10.30857/2617-0272.2024.1.7
English
Article
Properties that reveal the expression of project graphics
Received 18.11.2023, Revised 15.01.2024, Accepted 03.03.2024
Abstract
Purpose. The research aims to identify and systematize the primary means of enhancing the expressiveness of images within the system of visual communication, characterized by a subjective evaluation of the quality of the work, establishing patterns and priorities for the application of techniques of graphic representation of expressive qualities in representative and communicative tasks. Methodology. The research utilized analysis of information sources in graphic design, psychology of perception, composition theory, structural and systemic analysis of graphic works, and synthesis of research results. Results. In contemporary design practice, project graphics serve as the primary means of conveying the value of an idea to the user, revealing its most important aspects during the stages of presenting the properties of the depicted object. Many exemplary works of graphic art prove the thesis that the effectiveness of visual communication depends not only on the correctness of the expression, which is determined by the spectrum of means of modelling the objective properties of an object, but also on the ability of the graphic form to evoke predictable emotions. This work examines the influence on the aesthetic evaluation of such components of image construction as graphic techniques, level of formalization and stylization, spatial composition, chosen perspectives, and lighting. The patterns of the application of techniques for modelling expressive qualities in the system of graphic design tasks are established. Scientific novelty. The study significantly expands and systematizes the nomenclature of expressive means for conveying the subjective properties of form in graphic design and establishes patterns in using techniques to enhance emotional impact. The practical significance of the obtained results lies in the possibility of applying them in the practice of design, the educational process of training specialists in artistic and creative fields, and further research in cultural studies, architecture and design
Keywords:
project graphics; graphic design; subjective properties of form; visualization; emotional response
- 519 Views
- Read article
References
[1] Adams, S. (2021). How design makes us think and feel and do things. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
[2] Berdynskykh, S. (2016). Synthesis of traditional and modern means of design and graphics at the art form. (Doctoral dissertation, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, Kyiv, Ukraine).
[3] Heller, S., & Chwast S. (2019). Graphic Styles: From Victorian to Hipster. Kyiv: ArtHuss.
[4] Itten, J. (2021). Design and form: The basic course at the Bauhaus and later. Kyiv: ArtHuss.
[5] Kuznetsova, I. (2006). Modeling of visual perception of objects of design, decorative applied and arts. (Doctoral dissertation, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, Kyiv, Ukraine).
[6] Yakovliev, M. (2007). Composition + geometry. Kyiv: Karavela.
[7] Yakovliev, M., Berdynskykh, S., Kolosnichenko, O., & Pashkevich, K. (2023). Objectivity and graphic formalization of modern project visualization in design. Art and Design, 1, 83-95. doi: 10.30857/2617-0272.2023.1.8.
[8] Bowman, W.J. (1968). Graphic communication. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
[9] Grigg, J. (2020). Materials and tools as catalysts of invention in graphic design ideation. Design Studies, 70, article number 100960. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2020.100960.
[10] López-Chao, V., & Rodríguez-Grela, M. (2023). Architectural graphics and the experience of space. Freehand drawing and photograph to deepen on communicative qualities in linear perspective. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 12(5), 855-866. doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2023.05.012.
[11] Mould, D., Mandryk, R.L., & Li, H. (2012). Emotional response and visual attention to nonphotorealistic images. Computers & Graphics, 36(6), 658-672. doi: 10.1016/j.cag.2012.03.039.
[12] Novica, D.R., Wianto, E., & Campos, S.A. (2023). Drawing and ideation process in design education: A systematic literature review. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10, article number 2219487. doi: 10.1080/23311983.2023.2219487.
[13] Park, J., Jin, Y., Ahn, S., & Lee, S. (2019). The impact of design representation on visual perception: Comparing eye-tracking data of architectural scenes between photography and line drawing. Archives of Design Research, 32(1), 5-29. doi: 10.15187/adr.2019.02.32.1.5.
[14] Samara, Т. (2007). Design elements: A graphic style manual. Gloucester, MA: Rockport Publishers.
[15] Smith, K.S. (2008). Architects’ sketches: Dialogue and design. London: Routledge.
[16] Kandinsky, W. (1926). Point and line to plane: Contribution to the analysis of the pictorial elements. Munich: Verlag A.Langen.
[17] Behance. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.behance.net/.