Received 14.03.2024, Revised 12.05.2024, Accepted 01.06.2024
The purpose of this study is to highlight how panoramic windows can significantly enhance energy efficiency in interior spaces. The aim is to identify and discuss the main benefits and disadvantages of these windows, as well as their classification according to the destination of the respective space. Methodology: the study was based on extensive bibliographic research, analyzing various sources such as books, articles and specialized publications in the field of architecture and energy efficiency. The author evaluated and interpreted the data and results obtained, organizing them logically to provide a coherent presentation of the topic. Results. The effective utilization of panoramic windows offers numerous benefits for enhancing energy efficiency indoors, including improved thermal insulation, optimized utilization of natural light, efficient control of solar radiation, and promotion of natural ventilation. Despite associated drawbacks such as thermal losses and maintenance costs, proper classification and climate adaptation can maximize energy efficiency and indoor comfort in buildings. Scientific novelty. The study explores the energy efficiency of buildings through the optimization of panoramic windows across various climatic and cultural contexts, employing advanced technologies in thermal insulation and solar control. Results, derived from exhaustive research and empirical data, underscore the advantages of these windows in enhancing the energy efficiency of buildings. Practical significance. The study highlights the multiple practical advantages of panoramic windows, such as improving thermal insulation and solar control, leading to energy savings and increased indoor comfort. The efficient use of energy through these windows not only reduces CO2 emissions but also protects the environment, promoting responsible resource consumption and contributing to societal progress through ecological innovations
architectural design; natural ventilation; window classification; interior comfort; natural lighting
[1] Birkeland, J. (2002). Design for sustainability: A sourcebook of integrated, eco-logical solutions. London: Routledge.
[2] Carletti, C., Sciurpi, F., & Pierangioli, L. (2014). The energy upgrading of existing buildings: Window and shading device typologies for energy efficiency refurbishment. Sustainability, 6(8), 5354-5377.
[3] Flaman, B. (2021). Managing energy use in modern buildings. Los Angeles: Getty Publications.
[4] Hee, W., Alghoul, M., Bakhtyar, B., OmKalthum, E., Shameri, M., Alrubaih, M., & Sopian, K. (2015). The role of window glazing on daylighting and energy saving in buidings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 323-343. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.020.
[5] Jain, K. (2023). Sustainable design practices for eco-interiors. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Enbinering Technology, 11, 1053-1055. doi: 10.22214/ijraset.2023.48732.
[6] Juffle, N.A., Rahman, M.M., & Asli, R.A. (2024). Roles of stakeholders for adopting sustainable design in buildings. Building Engineering, 2(1), article number 561. doi: 10.59400/be.v2i1.561.
[7] Lee, E.S., DiBartolomeo, D.L., & Selkowitz, S.E. (2012). Thermal and daylighting performance of an automated venetian blind and lighting system in a full-scale private office. Energy and Buildings, 47, 328-342. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7788(98)00035-8.
[8] Liu, X., & Wu, Y. (2022). A review of advanced architectural glazing technologies for solar energy conversion and intelligent daylighting control. Architectural Intelligence, 1(10), 1-32. doi: 10.1007/s44223-022-00009-6.
[9] Liu, X., & Wu, Y. (2021). Experimental characterisation of a smart glazing with tuneable transparency, light scattering ability and electricity generation function. Applied Energy, 303, article number 117521. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117521.
[10] Mfon, I. (2023). Aesthetic considerations in architectural design: Exploring pleasure, arousal, and dominance. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 4(8), 923-935.
[11] Moscoso, C., Chamilothori, K., Wienold, J., Andersen, M., & Matusiak, B. (2020). Window size effects on subjective impressions of daylit spaces: Indoor studies at high latitudes using virtual. The Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 17(3), 242-264. doi: 10.1080/15502724.2020.1726183.
[12] prEN No. 15315-2005 "Building Heating Systems, Energy Efficiency of Buildings". (2005, July). Retrieved from https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/cb255044-1af7-4eaa-a916-f04484da0d7a/osist-pren15315-2005.
[13] Razaei, S.D., Shannigrahi S., & Ramakrishna, S.A. (2017). A review of conventional, advanced, and smart glazing technologies and materials for improving indoor environmment. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 159, 26-51. doi: 10.1016%2Fj.solmat.2016.08.026.
[14] Satumane, A., & Rockcastle, S. (2023). The impact of space function and window view on perceived indoor environmental quality and privacy. In ARCC international conference. Dallas, Texas: ARCC.
[15] Wang, J., Zhang, L., & Chen, H. (2018). Energysaving potential analysis of dynamic facade for office buildings in different climates. Energy and Buildings, 158, 662-673.